Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0673

    Case T-673/20: Action brought on 11 November 2020 — Celler Lagravera v EUIPO — Cyclic Beer Farm (Cíclic)

    IO C 19, 18.1.2021, p. 62–62 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    11/11/2020
    Date lodged:
    11/11/2020
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Spáinnis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Defendant:
    Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    18.1.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 19/62

    Action brought on 11 November 2020 — Celler Lagravera v EUIPO — Cyclic Beer Farm (Cíclic)

    (Case T-673/20)

    (2021/C 19/66)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Celler Lagravera, SLU (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyclic Beer Farm, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

    Trade mark at issue: Application for the European Union figurative mark ‘Cíclic’ — Application for registration No 17 948 980

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 August 2020 in Case R 465/2020-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in so far as, by dismissing the appeal of Celler Lagravera, SLU, it confirms the Opposition Division’s decision No B 3 071 125 upholding the opposition against all the goods covered by EU trade mark No 17 948 980 ‘Cíclic’ (figurative) designating ‘wines’ in Class 33; and

    —

    order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    Top