Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0779

Case T-779/17: Action brought on 30 November 2017 — United Wineries v EUIPO — Compañía de Vinos Miguel Martín (VIÑA ALARDE)

IO C 42, 5.2.2018, p. 31–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
30/11/2017
Date lodged:
30/11/2017
Author:
Cúirt Ghinearálta
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
Authentic language:
Spáinnis
Type of procedure:
Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

5.2.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/31

Action brought on 30 November 2017 — United Wineries v EUIPO — Compañía de Vinos Miguel Martín (VIÑA ALARDE)

(Case T-779/17)

(2018/C 042/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: United Wineries, SA (Cenicero, Spain) (represented by: J. Oria Sousa-Montes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Compañía de Vinos Miguel Martín, SL (Cigales, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: United Wineries, SA

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘VIÑA ALARDE’ — Application for registration No 13 390 521

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 in Case R 281/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

declare the present action, together with its annexes, admissible;

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 42(2) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top