Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0765

    Case T-765/17: Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)

    IO C 22, 22.1.2018, p. 56–57 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    23/11/2017
    Date lodged:
    23/11/2017
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Gearmáinis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    22.1.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 22/56

    Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)

    (Case T-765/17)

    (2018/C 022/75)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Kiku GmbH (Girlan, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

    Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Dresden, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before the CPVO

    Proprietor of the contested plant varieties: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Plant variety at issue: Plant variety right for the apple variety ‘PINOVA’ — Certificate No EU 1298

    Procedure before the CPVO: Nullity proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 16 August 2017 in Case A005/2016

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order the CPVO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 20(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles 10 and 116(1), of Regulation No 2100/94.
    Top