Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017CN0209

    Case C-209/17 P: Appeal brought on 21 April 2017 by NG against the order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 28 February 2017 in Case T-193/16: NG v European Council

    IO C 231, 17.7.2017, p. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    21/04/2017
    Date lodged:
    21/04/2017
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Type of procedure:
    Achomharc, Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    17.7.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 231/13

    Appeal brought on 21 April 2017 by NG against the order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 28 February 2017 in Case T-193/16: NG v European Council

    (Case C-209/17 P)

    (2017/C 231/17)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: NG (represented by: P. O’Shea, BL, I. Whelan, BL, B. Burns, Solicitor)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Council

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Set aside the whole of the order of the General Court of 28 February 2017 by which the General Court held that the action be dismissed on the ground of the General Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it;

    —

    Give a final judgment in the matter that is the subject of this appeal and hold that the General Court was wrong in law to decline jurisdiction and order the respondent in case T-193/16 to pay the costs of the appellant in respect of the order of the General Court and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this appeal;

    —

    Remit the issues raised in these proceedings for adjudication back to the General Court with a direction that it should accept jurisdiction.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    1.

    Failure to give reasons;

    2.

    Failure to properly consider whether the challenged agreement was in reality a decision of the respondent;

    3.

    Ignoring relevant factual issues;

    4.

    Failure to consider evidence that was before it;

    5.

    Failure to fully investigate and assess material issues;

    6.

    Failure to make further relevant enquiries;

    7.

    Making a decision without the benefit of sufficient information;

    8.

    Disregarding the principles established by the Court in case C-294/83.
    Top