Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62016TN0806

Case T-806/16: Action brought on 15 November 2016 — Agricola J.M. v EUIPO — Torres (CLOS DE LA TORRE)

IO C 14, 16.1.2017, p. 53–54 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
15/11/2016
Date lodged:
15/11/2016
Author:
Cúirt Ghinearálta
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
Authentic language:
Spáinnis
Type of procedure:
Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

16.1.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/53

Action brought on 15 November 2016 — Agricola J.M. v EUIPO — Torres (CLOS DE LA TORRE)

(Case T-806/16)

(2017/C 014/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Agricola J.M., SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: J. Clos Creus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain).

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘CLOS DE LA TORRE’ — Application for registration No 13 029 533

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2016 in Case R 2099/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2016;

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 7 August 2015, which upheld the opposition against all the products in class 33: ‘alcoholic beverages (except beers)’ by refusing the Community trade mark for all the contested goods;

—

alter earlier decisions by granting registration of the mark to the applicant for all the goods in class 33;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of this action.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the case-law arising from cases similar to the present case.
Top