Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0206

    Case T-206/13: Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Stance/OHIM — Pokarna (STANCE)

    IO C 171, 15.6.2013, p. 34–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    08/04/2013
    Date lodged:
    08/04/2013
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    15.6.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/34

    Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Stance/OHIM — Pokarna (STANCE)

    (Case T-206/13)

    2013/C 171/63

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Stance, Inc. (San Clemente, United States) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pokarna Ltd (Secundrabad, India)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 1 February 2013 in Case R 885/2012-5 pertaining to the opposition based on Community trademark registration No. 005 491 329 against Community trademark application No. 008 957 516‘STANCE’;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘STANCE’ for goods in class 25 — Community trade mark application 8 957 516

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration of the black and white figurative mark ‘STANZA’, for goods and services in classes 25 et 35

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 65, 8(1)(b), 75, 76(1), (2) and 83 of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

    Top