Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013FA0054

    Case F-54/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 September 2014  — CV v EESC (Civil service — Action for damages — Administrative investigations — Disciplinary procedure — Psychological harassment)

    IO C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 52–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    18/09/2014
    Date lodged:
    31/05/2013
    Author:
    An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Fraincis

    24.11.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 421/52

    Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 September 2014 — CV v EESC

    (Case F-54/13) (1)

    ((Civil service - Action for damages - Administrative investigations - Disciplinary procedure - Psychological harassment))

    2014/C 421/72

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: CV (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented initially by: M. Arsène and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, F.-M. Hislaire and M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Pascua Mateo and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, F.-M. Hislaire and M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyers)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of the EESC’s decision rejecting a request made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the excessive zeal, or even harassment, on the part of the administration.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Tribunal:

    1.

    Dismisses the application;

    2.

    Declares that each party is to bear its own costs.

    (1)  OJ C 207, 20.07.2013, p. 64.

    Top