This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0008
Case C-8/10: Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Case C-8/10: Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Case C-8/10: Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
IO C 80, 27.3.2010, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/01/2010
- Date lodged:
- 08/01/2010
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request to establish failure to fulfil an obligation 32006L0046
- Link
|
27.3.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 80/13 |
Action brought on 8 January 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-8/10)
2010/C 80/22
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. de Schietere de Lophem, Agents)
Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Form of order sought
|
— |
declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts, 86/635/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/EEC on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
|
— |
order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The period for the transposition of Directive 2006/46/EC lapsed on 5 September 2008. At the date the present action was commenced, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not informed the Commission of those measures.
