Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2011:103:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 103, 2 April 2011


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.103.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 103

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 54
2 April 2011


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 103/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 95, 26.3.2011

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2011/C 103/02

Joined Cases C-436/08 and C-4367/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz (Austria)) — Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel BetriebsgmbH (C-436/08), Österreichische Salinen AG (C-437/08) v Finanzamt Linz (Free movement of capital — Corporation tax — Exemption of nationally-sourced dividends — Exemption of foreign-sourced dividends only if certain conditions are complied with — Application of an imputation system to non-exempt foreign-sourced dividends — Proof required as to the foreign tax creditable)

2

2011/C 103/03

Case C-52/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera AB (Preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Abuse of dominant position — Prices applied by telecommunications operator — ADSL input services — Broadband connection services to end users — Margin squeeze on competitors)

3

2011/C 103/04

Case C-251/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 February 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus (Public works contracts and supply contracts — Water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors — Directive 93/38/EEC — Contract notice — Award criteria — Equal treatment of tenderers — Principle of transparency — Directive 92/13/EEC — Review procedure — Requirement to state reasons for a decision to eliminate a tenderer)

4

2011/C 103/05

Case C-260/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 February 2011 — Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH (formerly CD-Contact Data GmbH) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Market for Nintendo video games consoles and games cartridges — Limitation of parallel exports in that market — Agreement between a manufacturer and an exclusive distributor — Distribution agreement allowing passive sales — Proof of a concurrence of wills in the absence of direct documentary evidence that passive sales were to be restricted — Standard of proof necessary to establish the existence of a vertical agreement)

4

2011/C 103/06

Case C-283/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Warszawa — Republic of Poland) — Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B Spółka z o.o. (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Taking of evidence — Examination of a witness by the requested court upon application by the requesting court — Payment of witness expenses)

5

2011/C 103/07

Joined Cases C-307/09 to C-309/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands)) — Vicoplus SC PUH (C-307/09), BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo (C-308/09), Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo (C-309/09) v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid (Freedom to provide services — Posting of workers — 2003 Act of Accession — Transitional measures — Access of Polish nationals to the labour market of States which were already Member States of the European Union at the time of the accession of the Republic of Poland — Requirement of a work permit for the making available of labour — Directive 96/71/EC — Article 1(3))

5

2011/C 103/08

Case C-359/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary)) — Donat Cornelius Ebert v Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara (Lawyers — Directive 89/48/EEC — Recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration — Directive 98/5/EC — Practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained — Use of the professional title of the host Member State — Conditions — Registration with the Bar Association of the host Member State)

6

2011/C 103/09

Case C-494/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Alessandria — Italy) — Bolton Alimentari SpA v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Alessandria (Preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Customs duty — Tariff quota — Customs Code — Article 239 — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Articles 308a, 308b and 905 — Regulation (EC) No 975/2003 — Tuna — Exhaustion of quota — Date of opening — Sunday)

6

2011/C 103/10

Case C-11/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Marishipping and Transport BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Common Customs Tariff — Customs duties — Relief — Pharmaceutical substances — Composition — Restrictions)

7

2011/C 103/11

Case C-16/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom)) — The Number Ltd, Conduit Enterprises Ltd v Office of Communications, British Telecommunications plc (Approximation of laws — Telecommunications — Networks and services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Designation of undertakings to provide universal service — Specific obligations imposed on the designated undertaking — Directory enquiry services and directories)

8

2011/C 103/12

Case C-25/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium)) — Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach eV v État belge (Direct taxation — Free movement of capital — Inheritance tax — Legacies in favour of non-profit-making bodies — Refusal to apply a reduced rate where those bodies have their centre of operations in a Member State other than that in which the deceased had actually lived or worked — Restriction — Justification)

8

2011/C 103/13

Case C-30/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Linköpings tingsrätt — Sweden) — Lotta Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmyndigheten (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 80/987/EEC — Article 10(c) — National provision — Guarantee of payment of employees’ outstanding claims — Exclusion of persons who, more recently than six months before the lodgement of the application for the declaration of insolvency of the company which employed them, were owners of an essential part of that company and had considerable influence on it)

9

2011/C 103/14

Case C-78/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Rouen — France) — Marc Berel and Others v Administration des douanes de Rouen, Receveur principal des douanes du Havre, Administration des douanes du Havre (Community Customs Code — Articles 213, 233 and 239 — Joint and several liability of several debtors for the same customs debt — Remission of import duties — Extinction of the customs debt — No possibility for a jointly and severally liable debtor to rely on a remission granted to another debtor)

9

2011/C 103/15

Case C-321/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2007/2/EC — Environment policy — Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) — Exchange and updates of data in electronic format — Incomplete transposition)

10

2011/C 103/16

Case C-391/10: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2007/36/EC — Exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies — Failure to transpose completely within the prescribed period)

10

2011/C 103/17

Case C-395/10: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2007/2/EC — Environment policy — Infrastructure for Spatial Information — Exchange and update of data in electronic format — Failure to adopt national measures transposing the directive)

11

2011/C 103/18

Case C-143/10 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2010 by Antoni Tomasz Uznański against the order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) made on 27 November 2009 in Case T-348/09 Uznański v Poland

11

2011/C 103/19

Case C-611/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Waldemar Hudzinski v Agentur für Arbeit Wesel — Familienkasse

11

2011/C 103/20

Case C-612/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Jaroslaw Wawrzyniak v Agentur für Arbeit Mönchengladbach — Familienkasse

11

2011/C 103/21

Case C-625/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — European Commission v French Republic

12

2011/C 103/22

Case C-626/10P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2010 by Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Seventh Chamber) on 21 October 2010 in Case T-439/08 Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA

13

2011/C 103/23

Case C-627/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

13

2011/C 103/24

Case C-5/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 6 January 2011 — Criminal Proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner

14

2011/C 103/25

Case C-25/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 17 January 2011 — Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA v Fazenda Pública

14

2011/C 103/26

Case C-34/11: Action brought on 21 January 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

15

2011/C 103/27

Case C-35/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England and Wales) (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 21 January 2011 — Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

15

2011/C 103/28

Case C-42/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour D’Appel D’Amiens (France) lodged on 31 January 2011 — Criminal proceedings against João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge

16

2011/C 103/29

Case C-46/11: Action brought on 1 February 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

16

2011/C 103/30

Case C-48/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 2 February 2011 — Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

17

2011/C 103/31

Case C-52/11 P: Appeal brought on 4 February 2011 by Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez against the order delivered by the General Court (Fourth Chamber) on 17 November 2010 in Case T-61/10

17

 

General Court

2011/C 103/32

Case T-118/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 February 2011 — P.P.TV v OHIM — Rentrak (PPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PPT — Earlier national figurative mark PPTV — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

19

2011/C 103/33

Case T-385/07: Judgment of the Court of 17 February 2011 — FIFA v Commission (Television broadcasting — Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC — Measures taken by the Kingdom of Belgium concerning events of major importance for Belgian society — Football World Cup — Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law — Statement of reasons — Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Right to property)

19

2011/C 103/34

Case T-55/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — UEFA v Commission (Television broadcasting — Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC — Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society — European Football Championship — Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law — Statement of reasons — Articles 49 EC and 86 EC — Right to property)

20

2011/C 103/35

Case T-68/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — FIFA v Commission (Television broadcasting — Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC — Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society — Football World Cup — Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law — Statement of reasons — Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC — Right to property)

20

2011/C 103/36

Case T-10/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Formula One Licensing v OHIM — Global Sports Media (FI-LIVE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark F1-LIVE — Earlier Community figurative marks, and national and international word marks, F1 and F1 Formula 1 — Opposition rejected by the Board of Appeal — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

21

2011/C 103/37

Case T-122/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods and Hubei Xinshiji Foods v Council (Dumping — Imports of prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in the People’s Republic of China — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Article 15(2) and Article 20(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 15(2) and Article 20(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

21

2011/C 103/38

Case T-324/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — J & F Participações v OHIM — Plusfood Wrexham (Friboi) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Friboi — Earlier national word mark FRIBO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

22

2011/C 103/39

Case T-385/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Annco v OHIM — Freche et fils (ANN TAYLOR LOFT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ANN TAYLOR LOFT — Earlier national word mark LOFT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

22

2011/C 103/40

Case T-471/10: Action brought on 28 September 2010 — Gill v Commission

22

2011/C 103/41

Case T-32/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission

23

2011/C 103/42

Case T-60/11: Action brought on 26 January 2011 — Kraft Foods Global Brands v OHIM — Fenaco (SUISSE PREMIUM)

24

2011/C 103/43

Case T-65/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Recombined Dairy System v Commission

25

2011/C 103/44

Case T-78/11 P: Appeal brought on 7 February 2011 by Erika Lenz against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 14 December 2010 in Case F-80/09 Lenz v Commission

25

2011/C 103/45

Case T-80/11: Action brought on 9 February 2011 — Nath Kalsi v OHIM — American Clothing Associates (RIDGE WOOD)

26

2011/C 103/46

Case T-85/11 P: Appeal brought on 11 February 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 23 November 2010 in Case F-65/09, Marcuccio v Commission

27

2011/C 103/47

Case T-88/11: Action brought on 18 February 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission

27

2011/C 103/48

Case T-92/11: Action brought on 18 February 2011 — Andersen v Commission

28


EN

 

Top