This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0693
Case T-693/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
Case T-693/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
Case T-693/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 52–53
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/52 |
Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
(Case T-693/22)
(2023/C 24/71)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Hilza — Pharmaceuticals, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.