Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TA0118

    Case T-118/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS — Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))

    OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, p. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, p. 26–26 (GA)

    7.6.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 222/27


    Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS)

    (Case T-118/21) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS - Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))

    (2022/C 222/45)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Cilem Records International UG (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: E. Hecht, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: KVZ Music Ltd (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Stechern, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 January 2021 (Case R 1060/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cilem Records International and KVZ Music.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Cilem Records International UG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO;

    3.

    Orders KVZ Music Ltd to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.


    Top