Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CA0296

    Case C-296/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons — Directive 91/477/EEC — Annex I, Part III — Deactivation standards and techniques — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 — Verification and certification of deactivation of firearms — Article 3 — Verifying entity approved by a national authority — Issuance of a deactivation certificate — Entity not included on the list published by the European Commission — Transfer of deactivated firearms within the European Union — Article 7 — Mutual recognition)

    OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 8–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.1.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 24/8


    Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A

    (Case C-296/21) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons - Directive 91/477/EEC - Annex I, Part III - Deactivation standards and techniques - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 - Verification and certification of deactivation of firearms - Article 3 - Verifying entity approved by a national authority - Issuance of a deactivation certificate - Entity not included on the list published by the European Commission - Transfer of deactivated firearms within the European Union - Article 7 - Mutual recognition)

    (2023/C 24/11)

    Language of the case: Finnish

    Referring court

    Korkein hallinto-oikeus

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: A

    Intervening parties: Helsingin poliisilaitos, Poliisihallitus

    Operative part of the judgment

    1.

    Part III of Annex I to Council Directive 91/477/EEC of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons, as amended by Directive 2008/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008, and Article 3 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 of 15 December 2015 establishing common guidelines on deactivation standards and techniques for ensuring that deactivated firearms are rendered irreversibly inoperable

    must be interpreted as not precluding a legal person governed by private law, such as a commercial company, from coming within the concept of ‘verifying entity’, referred to in paragraph 1 of the latter provision, where that person appears on the list published by the European Commission pursuant to Article 3(3) of that implementing regulation.

    2.

    Part III of Annex I to Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive 2008/51, and Article 7(2) of Implementing Regulation 2015/2403

    must be interpreted as meaning that, where a deactivation certificate for a firearm is issued by a ‘verifying entity’, the Member State to which the deactivated firearm is transferred is required to recognise that certificate, unless the competent authorities of that Member State find, during a summary examination of the weapon in question, that that certificate clearly does not satisfy the requirements laid down in that implementing regulation.


    (1)  OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.


    Top