This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0090
Case C-90/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Remuneration — Annual salary adjustment — Action for annulment and damages)
Case C-90/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Remuneration — Annual salary adjustment — Action for annulment and damages)
Case C-90/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Remuneration — Annual salary adjustment — Action for annulment and damages)
OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/6 |
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB)
(Case C-90/21 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Remuneration - Annual salary adjustment - Action for annulment and damages)
(2023/C 24/06)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Vincent Thunus, Jaime Barragán, Marc D’hooge, Alexandra Felten, Christophe Nègre, Patrick Vanhoudt (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: A. V. García Sanchez, T. Gilliams, J. Klein and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and by P.–E. Partsch, avocat)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Vincent Thunus, Mr Jaime Barragán, Mr Marc D’hooge, Ms Alexandra Felten, Mr Christophe Nègre and Mr Patrick Vanhoudt to pay the costs. |