This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0549
Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 95, 28.2.2022, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 95, 28.2.2022, p. 10–10
(GA)
|
28.2.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/30 |
Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS)
(Case T-549/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark SUPERZINGS - Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 95/40)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Magic Box Int. Toys SLU (Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Rivas Zurdo and E. López Leiva, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: KMA Concepts Ltd. (Mahé, Seychelles) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll and I. Osinaga Lozano, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2020 (Case R 2511/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between KMA Concepts and Magic Box Int. Toys.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Magic Box Int. Toys SLU to bear its owns costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by KMA Concepts Ltd. |