This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0270
Case T-270/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Appraisal report — 2018 appraisal exercise — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of impartiality — Right to a fair hearing — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
Case T-270/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Appraisal report — 2018 appraisal exercise — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of impartiality — Right to a fair hearing — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
Case T-270/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Appraisal report — 2018 appraisal exercise — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of impartiality — Right to a fair hearing — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 7/20 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB
(Case T-270/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Appraisal report - 2018 appraisal exercise - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of impartiality - Right to a fair hearing - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Liability)
(2023/C 7/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: JS (represented by L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by L. Forestier, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Court Registry on 7 May 2020, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of his appraisal report for 2018 and of the decision of 22 January 2020 rejecting his complaint and, secondly, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders JS to pay the costs. |