EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0131
Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)
Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)
Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)
OJ C 279, 24.8.2020, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 279/10 |
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX
(Case C-131/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Disciplinary proceedings - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 4 - Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented - Article 22 - Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty - Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented - Assessment of medical evidence - Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)
(2020/C 279/13)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, T. S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018, CX v Commission (T-743/16 RENV, not published, EU:T:2018:937); |
|
2. |
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |