This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0429
Case C-429/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 5 August 2015 — Evelyn Danqua v The Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General
Case C-429/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 5 August 2015 — Evelyn Danqua v The Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General
Case C-429/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 5 August 2015 — Evelyn Danqua v The Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General
OJ C 320, 28.9.2015, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 320/23 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 5 August 2015 — Evelyn Danqua v The Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General
(Case C-429/15)
(2015/C 320/31)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Court of Appeal
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Evelyn Danqua
Defendant: The Minister for Justice and Equality Ireland and the Attorney General
Other party: The Refugee Legal Services
Questions referred
|
1. |
Can an application for asylum, which is governed by domestic legislation which reflects a Member State's obligations under the Qualification Directive, be regarded as an appropriate comparator in respect of an application for subsidiary protection for the purposes of the principle of equivalence? |
|
2. |
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is it relevant for this purpose that the time limit imposed in respect of applications for subsidiary protection serves the important interest of ensuring that applications for international protection are dealt within a reasonable time? |