This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0714
Case T-714/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-714/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-714/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 346, 19.10.2015, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.10.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 346/25 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT)
(Case T-714/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 346/28)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Gold Crest LLC (Goleta, United States) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2013 (Case R 2038/2012-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MIGHTY BRIGHT as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Gold Crest LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |