This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FB0033
Case F-33/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post — Action out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-33/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post — Action out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-33/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post — Action out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 55–56
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 421/55 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-33/13)
((Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s handwritten signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 421/78
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa and L. Mansullo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for payment of financial compensation for the days of leave not taken when he was on sick leave from 4 January 2002 to 31 May 2005.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Marcuccio is order to bear his own costs. |