This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FB0031
Case F-31/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days — Application received by post within the following ten days — Applications not the same — Action out of time)
Case F-31/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days — Application received by post within the following ten days — Applications not the same — Action out of time)
Case F-31/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days — Application received by post within the following ten days — Applications not the same — Action out of time)
OJ C 313, 26.10.2013, p. 35–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.10.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 313/35 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-31/13)
(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days - Application received by post within the following ten days - Applications not the same - Action out of time)
2013/C 313/66
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Re:
Action to annul the dismissal of the applicant’s application requesting payment of compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered following his reassignment from the Commission delegation in Luanda to the Commission headquarters in Brussels.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs. |