Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TB0379

    Case T-379/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission (Interim relief — Environment — Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC — Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision — Application for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency)

    OJ C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 33–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.11.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 347/33


    Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission

    (Case T-379/11 R)

    (Interim relief - Environment - Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC - Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision - Application for interim measures - Admissibility - Urgency)

    2011/C 347/59

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicants: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH (Duisburg, Germany); Rogesa — Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (Dillingen, Germany); Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH (Salzgitter, Allemagne); ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg); and voestalpine Stahl GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and K. Herrmann, Agents)

    Re:

    Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The application for interim measures is dismissed.

    2.

    Costs are reserved.


    Top