Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TA0457

    Case T-457/11: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Valeo Vision v Commission (Application for annulment — Common Customs Tariff — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff heading — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)

    OJ C 313, 26.10.2013, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.10.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 313/24


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Valeo Vision v Commission

    (Case T-457/11) (1)

    (Application for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff heading - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

    2013/C 313/46

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Valeo Vision (Bobigny, France) (represented by: R. Ledru, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. R. Killmann and L. Keppenne, Agents)

    Re:

    Application for the annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 603/2011 of the Commission of 20 June 2011 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2011 L 163, p. 10).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

    2.

    Orders Valeo Vision to pay its own costs and those of the European Commission


    (1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.


    Top