This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0015
Case T-15/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Pandalis v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus) ((EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Cystus — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No genuine use of the mark))
Case T-15/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Pandalis v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus) ((EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Cystus — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No genuine use of the mark))
Case T-15/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Pandalis v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus) ((EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Cystus — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No genuine use of the mark))
OJ C 95, 27.3.2017, p. 10–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 14/02/2017
- Date lodged:
- 14/01/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TJ0015
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
27.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/10 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Pandalis v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
(Case T-15/16) (1)
(((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Cystus - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the mark)))
(2017/C 095/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Georgios Pandalis (Glandorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2015 (Case R 2839/2014-1), relating to revocation proceedings between LR Health & Beauty Systems and Mr Pandalis.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Georgios Pandalis to pay the costs. |
