Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0622

    Case C-622/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 7 October 2021 — Financijska agencija v MINERAL-SEKULINE d.o.o.

    OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.6.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 222/7


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 7 October 2021 — Financijska agencija v MINERAL-SEKULINE d.o.o.

    (Case C-622/21)

    (2022/C 222/11)

    Language of the case: Hungarian

    Referring court

    Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Financijska agencija

    Respondent MINERAL-SEKULINE d.o.o.

    Question referred

    Can the rule laid down in the second part of the first sentence and in the second sentence of Article 177(3) of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts), which provides that ‘a case before a court of second instance shall be deemed to be closed on the date on which the decision is sent from the court office, after the case has been returned by the Registration Service. The Registration Service shall be required to return the file to the court office as promptly as possible after receipt thereof. The decision shall then be notified within a further period of eight days’ be considered compatible with Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter?


    Top