This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0562
Case C-562/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 September 2021 — European arrest warrant issued against X, Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
Case C-562/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 September 2021 — European arrest warrant issued against X, Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
Case C-562/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 September 2021 — European arrest warrant issued against X, Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
OJ C 2, 3.1.2022, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 2/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 September 2021 — European arrest warrant issued against X, Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
(Case C-562/21)
(2022/C 2/23)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Rechtbank Amsterdam
Parties to the main proceedings
European arrest warrant issued against: X
Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
Question referred
What test should an executing judicial authority apply when deciding whether to execute an EAW for the purpose of executing a final custodial sentence or detention order when examining whether, in the issuing Member State, the trial resulting in the conviction was conducted in breach of the right to a tribunal previously established by law, where no effective remedy was available in that Member State for any breach of that right?