This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0013
Case T-13/22: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Loutsou v EUIPO (POLIS LOUTRON) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark POLIS LOUTRON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-13/22: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Loutsou v EUIPO (POLIS LOUTRON) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark POLIS LOUTRON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-13/22: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Loutsou v EUIPO (POLIS LOUTRON) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark POLIS LOUTRON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, p. 31–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 7/31 |
Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Loutsou v EUIPO (POLIS LOUTRON)
(Case T-13/22) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark POLIS LOUTRON - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2023/C 7/40)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Alexandra Loutsou (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: S. Psomakakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 October 2021 (Case R 544/2020-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Alexandra Loutsou to pay the costs. |