Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TA0776

    Case T-776/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — Gameageventures v EUIPO — (GAME TOURNAMENTS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark GAME TOURNAMENTS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration)

    OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, p. 31–31 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.1.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 7/31


    Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — Gameageventures v EUIPO — (GAME TOURNAMENTS)

    (Case T-776/21) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark GAME TOURNAMENTS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration)

    (2023/C 7/39)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Gameageventures LLP (Folkestone, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Santos Rodríguez, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 October 2021 (Case R 211/2021-5).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Gameageventures LLP to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.


    Top