Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0377

    Case T-377/20: Action brought on 18 June 2020 — KN v EESC

    OJ C 279, 24.8.2020, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.8.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/43

    Action brought on 18 June 2020 — KN v EESC

    (Case T-377/20)

    (2020/C 279/57)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare the present application admissible;

    —

    annul the contested decision of 9 June 2020, notified on 17 June 2020;

    —

    order the payment of compensation for non-material damage, amounting to the sum of EUR 200 000, and compensation for material damage, estimated in the amount of EUR 50 000;

    —

    order the defendant to pay all the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging infringement of procedural rights and of the fundamental rights to good administration and to be heard as well as infringement of the principle of proportionality.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of presumption of innocence and of the principle of impartiality.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty, in accordance with the maxim ‘nulla poena sine lege’, and of the principle of non-retroactivity.

    4.

    Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of confidentiality of disciplinary proceedings and judicial investigations as well as an apparent infringement of the guarantees provided under Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).
    Top