EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0655
Case T-655/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission
Case T-655/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission
Case T-655/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission
OJ C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 87–88
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/87 |
Action brought on 27 September 2019 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission
(Case T-655/19)
(2019/C 399/106)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicants: Ferriera Valsabbia SpA (Odolo, Italy), Valsabbia Investimenti SpA (Odolo) (represented by: D. Slater, Solicitor, G. Carnazza and D. Fosselard, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision, in so far as it concerns them; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU, and of Article 14 and Article 27(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1), and of Articles 11, 12 and 14 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18)
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging incorrect interpretation and infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and infringement of Article 296 TFEU
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement and incorrect interpretation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and of Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, with consequent infringement of the law and misuse of powers
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 296, incorrect and contrary reasoning and a manifest error of assessment
|