This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0502
Case T-502/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — IRF (MediWell) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MediWell — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL and earlier national figurative mark well & well LES PHARMACIENS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-502/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — IRF (MediWell) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MediWell — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL and earlier national figurative mark well & well LES PHARMACIENS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-502/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — IRF (MediWell) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MediWell — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL and earlier national figurative mark well & well LES PHARMACIENS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 51–52
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/51 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — IRF (MediWell)
(Case T-502/18) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark MediWell - Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL and earlier national figurative mark well & well LES PHARMACIENS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 399/62)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pharmadom (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: M.-P. Dauquaire, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: IRF s. r. o. (Bratislava, Slovakia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2018 (Case R 6/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Pharmadom and IRF.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Pharmadom to pay the costs. |