Ez a dokumentum az EUR-Lex webhelyről származik.
Dokumentum 62018TA0225
Case T-225/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Manéa v CdT (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew the applicant’s contract — Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision — Liability)
Case T-225/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Manéa v CdT (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew the applicant’s contract — Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision — Liability)
Case T-225/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Manéa v CdT (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew the applicant’s contract — Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision — Liability)
OJ C 399, 25.11.2019., 47—47. o.
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/47 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Manéa v CdT
(Case T-225/18) (1)
(Civil service - Temporary members of staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew the applicant’s contract - Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision - Liability)
(2019/C 399/56)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Camelia Manéa (Echternach, Luxembourg) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas and M. Bertha, lawyers)
Defendant: Translation Centre for the bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: J. Rikkert and M. Garnier, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the CdT’s decision of 29 May 2017 not to renew the applicant’s employment contract, second, an order that the CdT is to reinstate her within the CdT, and, third, compensation for the material and non-material damage resulting from the loss of permanent employment and from the CdT’s decision of 12 November 2015 not to renew the applicant’s employment contract.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Ms Camelia Manéa to pay the costs. |