This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0157
Case T-157/18: Action brought on 28 February 2018 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission
Case T-157/18: Action brought on 28 February 2018 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission
Case T-157/18: Action brought on 28 February 2018 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission
OJ C 142, 23.4.2018, p. 69–69
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.4.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 142/69 |
Action brought on 28 February 2018 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission
(Case T-157/18)
(2018/C 142/88)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Caprice Schuhproduktion GmbH & Co. KG (Pirmasens, Germany) (represented by: S. De Knop, B. Natens and A. Willems, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
declare the application admissible; |
|
— |
annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14; and |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law. The pleas put forward are identical to those put forward in Case T-127/18, Cortina and FLA Europe v Commission.