Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0139

    Case T-139/18: Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission

    OJ C 142, 23.4.2018, p. 68–68 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.4.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 142/68

    Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission

    (Case T-139/18)

    (2018/C 142/87)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Avio SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    regarding the substance, annul Commission Decision C(2016) 4621 final of 20 July 2016 concerning the authorisation, under Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, of the concentration ‘ASL/Arianespace’, Case COMP/M.7724;

    —

    by way of a measure of inquiry, order the Commission, pursuant to Articles 88, 89 and 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure, to submit the documents referred to in Section III of the present application;

    —

    order the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    This action is brought against Commission Decision C(2016) 4621 final of 20 July 2016 concerning the authorisation, under Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, of the concentration ‘ASL/Arianespace’, Case COMP/M.7724, as published in its non-confidential version on 11 December 2017.

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment, failure to conduct a proper investigation and failure to state adequate reasons

    —

    The Commission made a manifest error of assessment, failed to conduct a proper investigation and failed to state adequate reasons by not correctly analysing the risk of foreclosure in the market for launchers operated by Arianespace, in particular with regard to capacity, inducements and anti-competitive effects;

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment

    —

    The Commission made a manifest error of assessment by not requiring undertakings to be given with respect to the market for launchers operated by Arianespace, particularly with regard to the risks to competition connected to the conflict of interests within Arianespace and the risk of exchange of sensitive information between Arianespace and ASL.
    Top