This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0139
Case T-139/18: Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission
Case T-139/18: Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission
Case T-139/18: Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission
OJ C 142, 23.4.2018, p. 68–68
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.4.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 142/68 |
Action brought on 21 February 2018 — Avio v European Commission
(Case T-139/18)
(2018/C 142/87)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Avio SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
— |
regarding the substance, annul Commission Decision C(2016) 4621 final of 20 July 2016 concerning the authorisation, under Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, of the concentration ‘ASL/Arianespace’, Case COMP/M.7724; |
— |
by way of a measure of inquiry, order the Commission, pursuant to Articles 88, 89 and 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure, to submit the documents referred to in Section III of the present application; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
This action is brought against Commission Decision C(2016) 4621 final of 20 July 2016 concerning the authorisation, under Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, of the concentration ‘ASL/Arianespace’, Case COMP/M.7724, as published in its non-confidential version on 11 December 2017.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment, failure to conduct a proper investigation and failure to state adequate reasons
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment
|