Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012FA0153

Case F-153/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 6 May 2014  — Forget v Commission (Civil service — Official — Remuneration — Family allowances — Household allowance — Condition governing the grant — Registered partnership under the law of Luxembourg — Couple comprised of stable, non-marital partners having access to legal marriage — Official who does not fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 1(2)(c)(iv) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)

OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 49–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.11.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/49


Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 6 May 2014 — Forget v Commission

(Case F-153/12) (1)

((Civil service - Official - Remuneration - Family allowances - Household allowance - Condition governing the grant - Registered partnership under the law of Luxembourg - Couple comprised of stable, non-marital partners having access to legal marriage - Official who does not fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 1(2)(c)(iv) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations))

2014/C 421/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claude Forget (Steinfort, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Kerger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer et A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision refusing payment of the household allowance and of the survivor’s pension for the applicant’s partner.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.

Dismisses the application;

2.

Orders Mr Forget to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 55, 23.02.2013, p. 26.


Top