This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0291
Case T-291/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Portovesme v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariff — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — New aid — Equal treatment — Reasonable period)
Case T-291/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Portovesme v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariff — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — New aid — Equal treatment — Reasonable period)
Case T-291/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Portovesme v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariff — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — New aid — Equal treatment — Reasonable period)
OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 421/29 |
Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Portovesme v Commission
(Case T-291/11) (1)
((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariff - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - New aid - Equal treatment - Reasonable period))
2014/C 421/39
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Portovesme Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Ciulli, G. Dore, M. Liberati and A. Vinci, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application, primarily, for the annulment in whole or in part ‘to the extent deemed reasonable’ of Commission Decision 2011/746/EU of 23 February 2011 on State aid granted by Italy to Portovesme Srl, ILA SpA, Eurallumina SpA and Syndial SpA (State aid measures C 38/B/04 (ex NN 58/04) and C 13/06 (ex N 587/05)) (OJ 2011 L 309, p. 1) or, in the alternative, for annulment of that decision in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid in question.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Portovesme Srl to pay the costs. |