This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0749
Case T-749/22: Action brought on 29 November 2022 — Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argest
Case T-749/22: Action brought on 29 November 2022 — Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argest
Case T-749/22: Action brought on 29 November 2022 — Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argest
OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 80–81
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 29/11/2022
- Date lodged:
- 29/11/2022
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Arbitration clause
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
23.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/80 |
Action brought on 29 November 2022 — Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argest
(Case T-749/22)
(2023/C 24/107)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Kazek and K. Wójcik, acting as Agents, and by N. Charrel, T. Gaspar and M. Jolly, lawyers)
Defendants: Union Technique du Bâtiment SA (Romainville, France) and Argest SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
order the companies Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA jointly and severally to pay it a total sum of EUR 161 200, together with statutory interest accruing from the date on which the present application was filed, capitalised to produce interest itself; |
|
— |
order the defendants to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that it has a right to compensation under the ten-year warranty provided by the companies Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA for defects discovered to be affecting the thatched roof of Maison Jean Monnet in Bazoches-sur-Guyonne.
