Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CA0702

Case C-702/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 — Laboratoire Pareva v Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG, European Commission, French Republic, European Chemicals Agency (Appeal — Biocidal products — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 — Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) — Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 — Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 — Teratogenic effect — Human health risk assessment)

OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.1.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/13


Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 — Laboratoire Pareva v Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG, European Commission, French Republic, European Chemicals Agency

(Case C-702/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Biocidal products - Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 - Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) - Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 - Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 - Teratogenic effect - Human health risk assessment)

(2023/C 7/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Laboratoire Pareva (represented by S. Englebert, M. Grunchard and M. Ombredane, avocats, P. Sellar, advocaat, and by K. Van Maldegem, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG, European Commission (represented by R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by G. Bain and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by C. Buchanan, M. Heikkilä and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders Laboratoire Pareva to pay the costs;

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.


Top