Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0450

    Case T-450/20: Action brought on 15 July 2020 — Tempora v Parliament

    OJ C 279, 24.8.2020, p. 64–64 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    15/07/2020
    Date lodged:
    15/07/2020
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Application for interim measures, Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    24.8.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/64

    Action brought on 15 July 2020 — Tempora v Parliament

    (Case T-450/20)

    (2020/C 279/80)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Tempora (Forest, Belgium) (represented by: A. Delvaux and R. Simar, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Parliament

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare that the action for annulment is admissible;

    —

    annul the decision, date unknown, by which the European Parliament decided to award the contract to SPRL IMAGINA EU;

    —

    order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action against the decision to award the contract to another tenderer in the context of call for tenders COMM/AWD/2019/421, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging breach of Article 15.2 of the tender specifications, breach of the duty of care and thoroughness, infringement of the principles of equality, competition and transparency, and breach of Article 170(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1) (‘Regulation 2018/1046’). In that regard, the applicant submits that the Parliament should have awarded it the contract, since SPRL IMAGINA EU did not have sufficient economic and financial resources and could not therefore be selected.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging breach of point 23 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 and of Article 16 of the tender specifications, infringement of the principles of equality, competition and transparency, and breach of the duty of care and thoroughness. The applicant submits that the prices submitted by SPRL IMAGINA EU in its offer are abnormally low and could not be accepted.
    Top