Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TB0246

    Case T-246/16: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2018 — Aurora Group Danmark v EUIPO — Retail Distribution (PANZER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 161, 7.5.2018, p. 51–51 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    09/03/2018
    Date lodged:
    13/05/2016
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Danish
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Link

    7.5.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 161/51

    Order of the General Court of 9 March 2018 — Aurora Group Danmark v EUIPO — Retail Distribution (PANZER)

    (Case T-246/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

    (2018/C 161/57)

    Language of the case: Danish

    Parties

    Applicant: Aurora Group Danmark A/S (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: L. Elmgaard Sørensen, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially, D. Gaja and, subsequently, T. Frydendahl and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Retail Distribution ApS (Hinnerup, Denmark) (represented by: E.A. Skovbo, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 (Case R 447/2015-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Retail Distribution and Aurora Group Danmark.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

    2.

    Aurora Group Danmark A/S and Retail Distribution ApS shall bear their own respective costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

    (1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

    Top