Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014CN0429

    Case C-429/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas lodged on 18 September 2014  — Air Baltic Corporation AS v Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba

    OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    18/09/2014
    Date lodged:
    18/09/2014
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Lithuanian
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Link

    24.11.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 421/21

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas lodged on 18 September 2014 — Air Baltic Corporation AS v Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba

    (Case C-429/14)

    2014/C 421/31

    Language of the case: Lithuanian

    Referring court

    Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant in cassation: Air Baltic Corporation AS

    Other party to the proceedings: Lietuvos Respublikos specialiųjų tyrimų tarnyba

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are Articles 19, 22 and 29 of the Montreal Convention to be understood and interpreted as meaning that an air carrier is liable to third parties, inter alia to the passengers’ employer, a legal person with which a transaction for the international carriage of passengers was entered into, for damage occasioned by a flight’s delay, on account of which the applicant (the employer) incurred additional expenditure connected with the delay (for example, the payment of travel expenses)?

    2.

    If the first question is answered in the negative, is Article 29 of the Montreal Convention to be understood and interpreted as meaning that those third parties have the right to bring claims against the air carrier on other bases, for example, in reliance upon national law?
    Top