EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CB0576
Case C-576/14 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft v European Commission, European Ombudsman (Appeal — Action for annulment — Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
Case C-576/14 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft v European Commission, European Ombudsman (Appeal — Action for annulment — Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
Case C-576/14 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft v European Commission, European Ombudsman (Appeal — Action for annulment — Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 320, 28.9.2015, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 04/06/2015
- Date lodged:
- 11/12/2014
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Hungarian
- Type of procedure:
- Appeal - unfounded, Action for annulment, Appeal - inadmissible
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62014CO0576
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
28.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 320/13 |
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft v European Commission, European Ombudsman
(Case C-576/14 P) (1)
((Appeal - Action for annulment - Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations - Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible))
(2015/C 320/18)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Appellant: Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft (represented by: K. Pap, ügyvéd)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Ombudsman
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft shall bear its own costs. |
