EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0164
Case C-164/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2013 — Turbo.com Mobile Phone’s BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Case C-164/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2013 — Turbo.com Mobile Phone’s BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Case C-164/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2013 — Turbo.com Mobile Phone’s BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
OJ C 171, 15.6.2013, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
15.6.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2013 — Turbo.com Mobile Phone’s BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-164/13)
2013/C 171/38
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Turbo.com Mobile Phone’s BV
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Question referred
Should the national authorities and judicial bodies, on the basis of the law of the European Union, refuse the right to deduct where it is established, on the basis of objective evidence, that there was VAT fraud in respect of the goods concerned and that the taxable person knew or should have known that he was participating therein, even if the national law does not make provision under those circumstances for refusing the right to deduct?