This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32013O0025
2013/458/EU: Guideline of the European Central Bank of 30 July 2013 amending Guideline ECB/2011/23 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (ECB/2013/25)
2013/458/EU: Guideline of the European Central Bank of 30 July 2013 amending Guideline ECB/2011/23 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (ECB/2013/25)
2013/458/EU: Guideline of the European Central Bank of 30 July 2013 amending Guideline ECB/2011/23 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (ECB/2013/25)
OJ L 247, 18/09/2013, p. 38–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force
Relation | Act | Comment | Subdivision concerned | From | To |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Modifies | 32011O0023 | Amendment | annex II | 01/06/2014 | |
Modifies | 32011O0023 | Amendment | annex III | 01/06/2014 |
18.9.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 247/38 |
GUIDELINE OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 30 July 2013
amending Guideline ECB/2011/23 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics
(ECB/2013/25)
(2013/458/EU)
THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 3.1 and 3.3, Articles 5.1, 12.1, 14.3 and Article 16 thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2533/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (1), and in particular Articles 4 and 8 thereof,
Having regard to Article 7 of Guideline ECB/2011/23 of 9 December 2011 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (2),
Having regard to the views of the Statistics Committee of the European System of Central Banks,
Whereas:
(1) |
In certain cases a strict application of the current standard valuation method for equity stocks in unlisted direct investment companies, as set out in Annex III to Guideline ECB/2011/23, may lead to distortions in the net international investment position. In these cases, Member States should be allowed to apply one of the other valuation methods set out in the sixth edition of the IMF’s Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual and therefore Guideline ECB/2011/23 should be amended accordingly. |
(2) |
Under Article 7 of Guideline ECB/2011/23, the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (ECB) is entitled to make technical amendments to the Annexes to Guideline ECB/2011/23, provided that they neither change the underlying conceptual framework nor affect the reporting burden of reporting agents in Member States. |
(3) |
The changes to the Annexes provided for in this Guideline are technical amendments which neither change the conceptual provision underlying the data reporting requirements nor affect the reporting burden in Member States, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS GUIDELINE:
Article 1
Amendments
Annexes II and III to Guideline ECB/2011/23 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Guideline.
Article 2
Final provisions
1. This Guideline shall take effect on the day of its notification to the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro.
2. Without prejudice to Article 8(2) of Guideline ECB/2011/23, this Guideline shall apply from 1 June 2014.
Article 3
Addressees
This Guideline is addressed to all Eurosystem central banks.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 30 July 2013.
For the Executive Board of the ECB
The President of the ECB
Mario DRAGHI
ANNEX
Annexes II and III to Guideline ECB/2011/23 are amended as follows:
1. |
in Annex II, Parts II and III of Table 3 are replaced by the following:
|
2. |
in Annex III, Section 6.1 is replaced by the following: ‘6.1. Direct investment is associated with a resident in one economy having control or a significant degree of influence on the management of an enterprise that is resident in another economy. Following international standards (BPM6), the direct or indirect ownership of 10 % or more of the voting power of an enterprise resident in one economy by an investor resident in another economy is evidence of such a relationship. Based on this criterion, a direct investment relationship can exist between a number of related enterprises, regardless of whether the linkage involves a single or a number of chains. It can extend to a direct investment enterprise’s subsidiaries, sub-subsidiaries and associates. Once the direct investment is established, all subsequent financial flows/holdings between the related entities are recorded as direct investment transactions/positions. Equity capital comprises equity in branches as well as all shares in subsidiaries and associates. Reinvested earnings consist of the offsetting entry to the direct investor’s share of earnings not distributed as dividends by subsidiaries or associates, and earnings of branches not remitted to the direct investor and that are recorded under “investment income” (see 3.2.3). Direct investment equity and debt are further disaggregated according to the type of relationship between entities and according to the direction of the investment. Three types of direct investment relationships can be distinguished:
With regard to the valuation of direct investment positions, the equity stocks listed in stock exchanges are valued at market prices. Conversely, in the case of unlisted direct investment companies, equity stocks are valued on the basis of book values using a common definition comprising the following accounting items:
For equity shares of unlisted companies, the transactions recorded in the financial account may differ from the own funds at book value recorded in the IIP. Such differences are recorded as revaluations due to other price changes. To increase the consistency in the valuation of assets and liabilities, equity stocks in unlisted direct investment companies can alternatively be valued according to one of the other valuation methods mentioned in paragraph 7.16 of the BPM6, if at least one of the following cases applies:
If an alternative method is applied for valuing equity stocks in unlisted direct investment companies, the IIP compiler is encouraged to inform the compiler in the counterpart country of the alternative method and to cooperate with this compiler to minimise the risk of bilateral asymmetric recording. This information should be transmitted within the ESCB in the framework of existing arrangements, as well as published in the ECB’s publication “European Union balance of payments/international investment position statistical methods”, which is used to monitor the concepts, definitions and compilation methods applied by the euro area Member States (as described in Annex V). It is recommended as a best practice that all Member States should compile foreign direct investment equity stocks and reinvested earnings on the basis of the results of foreign direct investment surveys to be collected at least annually (*1). (*1) The following unacceptable practices should be abandoned: (i) leaving the choice of the valuation criterion to reporting agents (market values or book values); (ii) the application of a perpetual inventory method/accumulation of BOP flows to compile stocks.’ " |
(*1) The following unacceptable practices should be abandoned: (i) leaving the choice of the valuation criterion to reporting agents (market values or book values); (ii) the application of a perpetual inventory method/accumulation of BOP flows to compile stocks.’ ”