Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019TN0348

    Kawża T-348/19: Rikors ippreżentat fl-10 ta’ Ġunju 2019 — Poggiolini vs Il-Parlament

    ĠU C 263, 5.8.2019, p. 56–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.8.2019   

    MT

    Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

    C 263/56

    Rikors ippreżentat fl-10 ta’ Ġunju 2019 — Poggiolini vs Il-Parlament

    (Kawża T-348/19)

    (2019/C 263/62)

    Lingwa tal-kawża: it-Taljan

    Partijiet

    Rikorrent: Danilo Poggiolini (Ruma, l-Italja) (rappreżentanti: F. Sorrentino u A. Sandulli, avukati)

    Konvenut: Il-Parlament Ewropew

    Talbiet

    Ir-rikorrent jitlob li l-Qorti Ġenerali jogħġobha tannulla n-nota kkontestata u tikkundanna lill-Parlament Ewropew iħallsu s-somom imnaqqsa indebitament pendente lite.

    Motivi u argumenti prinċipali

    Dan ir-rikors ġie ppreżentat kontra n-nota Nru D(2019) 14435 tal-11 ta’ April 2019 tad-Direttorat Ġenerali tal-Finanzi tal-Parlament Ewropew, dwar id-determinazzjoni tal-pensjoni li għandu jibbenefika minnha r-rikorrent fil-kwalità tiegħu bħala eks membru tal-Parlament Ewropew.

    Il-motivi u l-argumenti prinċipali huma simili għal dawk li huma invokati fil-Kawża T-347/19, Falqui vs Il-Parlament Ewropew.

    Top