This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/211/37
Case C-297/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Regensburg (Germany) lodged on 21 June 2007 — Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg v Klaus Bourquain
Case C-297/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Regensburg (Germany) lodged on 21 June 2007 — Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg v Klaus Bourquain
Case C-297/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Regensburg (Germany) lodged on 21 June 2007 — Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg v Klaus Bourquain
SL C 211, 8.9.2007, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.9.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 211/20 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Regensburg (Germany) lodged on 21 June 2007 — Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg v Klaus Bourquain
(Case C-297/07)
(2007/C 211/37)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Regensburg
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg
Defendant: Klaus Bourquain
Question referred
With regard to the interpretation of Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (1), does the rule prohibiting a person whose trial has been finally disposed of in one contracting party from being prosecuted in another contracting party for the same act apply, where the penalty imposed on him could never be enforced under the laws of the sentencing contracting party?