Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011FN0092

    Case F-92/11: Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v EESC

    SL C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 46–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.11.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 347/46

    Action brought on 23 September 2011 — ZZ v EESC

    (Case F-92/11)

    2011/C 347/86

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of the decision of the EESC refusing the applicant’s request for acknowledgement that he was the victim of misconduct, as a result of lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care, and for measures to be taken in order to establish publicly the applicant’s merits and abilities, and a claim for damages.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of 14 June 2011 of the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee (Appointing authority/EESC) rejecting the applicant’s complaint seeking acknowledgement that he was the victim of misconduct, as a result of lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care, and requesting that measures be taken to establish publicly the applicant’s merits and abilities, in particular the applicant’s capacity to run an administrative unit and manage its human and financial resources;

    —

    order the EESC to pay a sum of EUR 15 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage resulting from a breach of the appointing authority’s duty of care;

    —

    order the EESC to pay the costs.
    Top