Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CB0289

    Case C-289/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Analysis, development, maintenance and support of telematic systems for the monitoring of products subject to excise duty — Rejection of the tender — Failure to state reasons for that rejection)

    SL C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.1.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 25/21


    Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

    (Case C-289/10 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Analysis, development, maintenance and support of telematic systems for the monitoring of products subject to excise duty - Rejection of the tender - Failure to state reasons for that rejection)

    (2012/C 25/36)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2010 in Case T-50/05 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 18 November 2004 rejecting the appellant’s tender in a tendering procedure relating to the analysis, development, maintenance and support of telematic systems to control the movement of products subject to excise duty and awarding the contract to another tenderer

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2.

    Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.


    Top