Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0400

    Case T-400/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Zero Industry v OHIM — zero Germany (zerorh+) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ — Earlier national figurative and word marks zero — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity between products — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    SL C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 56–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.11.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 267/56


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Zero Industry v OHIM — zero Germany (zerorh+)

    (Case T-400/06) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ - Earlier national figurative and word marks zero - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity between products - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    2009/C 267/95

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Zero Industry Srl (Mariano Comense, Italy) (represented by: M. Rapisardi and N. Colombo, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG, formerly zero International Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: W.-D. Kuntze, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 October 2006 (Case R 958/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG and Zero Industry Srl.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Zero Industry Srl to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.


    Top