Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0391

Case T-391/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Arcandor v OHIM — dm drogerie market (S-HE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark S-HE — Earlier national word mark SHE, earlier national and international figurative trade mark She — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Lack of similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

SL C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.11.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/55


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Arcandor v OHIM — dm drogerie market (S-HE)

(Case T-391/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark S-HE - Earlier national word mark SHE, earlier national and international figurative trade mark She - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Lack of similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 267/94

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Arcandor AG, previously Karstadt Quelle AG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: dm drogerie market GmbH (Wals, Austria) (represented by: N. Dick and M. Dyck, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM No R 301/2006-1 of 26 September 2006 concerning opposition proceedings between Karstadt Quelle AG and dm drogerie market GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action.

2.

Orders Arcandor AG, previouslyt Karstadt Quelle AG to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 42 of 24.2.2007.


Top