This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009CN0146
Case C-146/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG
Case C-146/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG
Case C-146/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG
SL C 153, 4.7.2009, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/04/2009
- Date lodged:
- 24/04/2009
- Author:
- Sud
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Authentic language:
- njemački
- Type of procedure:
- Prethodno pitanje
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 31997L0007 članak 6.3 alineja 3
- Link
|
4.7.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 153/26 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG
(Case C-146/09)
2009/C 153/49
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl
Defendant: Stadtwerke Aachen AG
Question referred
Is the third example in the third indent of Article 6(3) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (1) to be interpreted as meaning that there is no right of withdrawal in respect of distance contracts for the mains supply of electricity and gas?
